You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 130 words from this article are provided below; about 380 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 92.2 | The History Cooperative
92.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Britain, America, and the Vietnam War. By Sylvia Ellis. (Westport: Praeger, 2004. xxii, 298 pp. $74.95, ISBN 0-275-97381-6.)

History, so the saying goes, never repeats itself, but sometimes it rhymes. Sylvia Ellis's book concerns the Anglo-American relationship over the war in Vietnam during the years of major escalation, and the reader cannot help but sense the contemporary resonance of her account. In Vietnam in the 1960s as in Iraq after mid-2002, U.S. presidents worked hard to win international backing for U.S. military intervention; on both occasions the results were meager, as allies real and potential questioned the wisdom and necessity of war and puzzled over Washington's seeming impatience with efforts at diplomacy. On both occasions, too, American leaders attached particular importance to the thinking in London. . . .

There are about 380 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.