You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 159 words from this article are provided below; about 370 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Sacred Debts: State Civil War Claims and American Federalism, 1861–1880. By Kyle S. Sinisi. (New York: Fordham University Press, 2003. xvi, 208 pp. $50.00, ISBN 0-8232-2259-4.)

By the mid-1860s, the U.S. government faced a glut of potential claims for Civil War–related expenses. State governments alone could demand as much as $468 million for the costs of troops, supplies, and damages incurred in the Union cause. Kyle S. Sinisi argues that the states' pursuit of these claims "represented the most sustained and expensive intergovernmental contact of the three decades following the war" (p. xii). But the national government was "not terribly sympathetic" (p. 180). Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase's stringent rules made it difficult to claim reimbursement from the federal coffers. With millions at stake and the cash-strapped states desperate for help, state officials set out on a pathbreaking quest to get their (more or less) just rewards by lobbying Congress for special settlements. . . .

There are about 370 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.