You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 222 words from this article are provided below; about 417 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Colonial Subjects: Puerto Ricans in a Global Perspective. By Ramón Grosfoguel. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. xvi, 268 pp. Cloth, $55.00, ISBN 0-520-23020-5. Paper, $21.95, ISBN 0-520-23021-3.)

In this ambitious book, Ramón Grosfoguel takes on some of the really big questions for a younger generation of leftist scholars of sociology, ethnic studies, and studies of colonialism. Where an older generation forged its methodological tools in the crucible of the post–World War II decolonization struggles and racial justice movements, current scholarship, as Grosfoguel argues poignantly, has to take account of the failures of revolutionary movements, the massive international migrations of the post-1965 period, and the inadequacy of an economism rooted in Marxism adequately to explain social relationships structured by race or gender. Grosfoguel is unsparing in his assessment of the inadequacies of leftist political programs. Thinking particularly of Latin America, he argues that revolutionary movements have become authoritarian regimes every bit as bad as the region's right-wing dictatorships; that programs for national independence from Euro-America have evolved into neocolonial relationships of dependence through debt and the political and economic activities of international organizations such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank. He also points to a problem that is giving rise to radical movements throughout the region: the race-based disenfranchisement of indigenous peoples. . . .

There are about 417 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.