You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 248 words from this article are provided below; about 323 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.4 | The History Cooperative
91.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2005
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Guarding the Golden Door: American Immigration Policy and Immigrants since 1882. By Roger Daniels. (New York: Hill and Wang, 2004. xii, 328 pp. $30.00, ISBN 0-8090-5343-8.)

Long acknowledged as an expert on the internment of Japanese and Japanese Americans during World War II, Roger Daniels has made considerable contributions to the general field of immigration history as well. In this volume, Daniels offers an in-depth examination and critique of American immigration from 1882 to the present. He takes 1882 as his starting point because that was the year the first Chinese Exclusion Act was passed, the first restrictive American immigration bill based on race and class, as it barred the entry of Chinese laborers for ten years. It was subsequently renewed a number of times and not repealed until 1943. Daniels and others have thus argued that the Chinese Exclusion Act was, in effect, the first piece of immigration legislation that moved American immigration policy from one of fairly free access to entry to one of restriction based on nativist ideas of inferiority and unassimilability. After his discussion of the exclusion of the Chinese, Daniels offers a detailed analysis of the evolution of the Immigration Act of 1924, which established national quotas for all immigrants and also barred the entry of anyone "ineligible to citizenship." These two facets of the act greatly reduced immigration from southern and eastern Europe and nearly all Asians, as they were the only people deemed racially ineligible for naturalization. . . .

There are about 323 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.