|
|
|
Book Review
| Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights: Reformers and the Politics of Maternal Welfare, 19171940. By Robyn L. Rosen. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2003. xviii, 196 pp. $42.95, ISBN 0-8142-0920-3.)
|
| In this very enlightening book, Robyn L. Rosen examines her subject through the work of four different women: Elizabeth Lowell Putnam, Ethel Sturges Dummer, Mary Ware Dennett, and Blanche Ames. Through these biographies Rosen looks carefully at the struggle for women's reproductive rights during the interwar period and the way that struggle related to larger social and political notions of maternal welfare. Those years were very important ones to birth control's entrance into a mainstream debate, where the idea of women as mothers would play a key role in gaining acceptance of contraceptive use. |
1
|
|
When Margaret Sanger brought discussions of contraception to the public just before World War I, she did so in a way that linked socialist politics and radical sexuality, neither of which would convince legislators to remove contraceptives from the list of obscene materials banned under the Comstock Law of 1873. She eventually found herself reshaping arguments to gain support. Sanger was a master at communication, which earned her significant attention then and subsequent attention by historians. |
. . . |
There are about 356 more words in this article.
Please log in (or, if you are not yet an
authorized user, please go to the
User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
|