You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 176 words from this article are provided below; about 327 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.3 | The History Cooperative
91.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Justice of Shattered Dreams: Samuel Freeman Miller and the Supreme Court during the Civil War Era. By Michael A. Ross. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2003. xxvi, 323 pp. Cloth, $69.95, ISBN 0-8071-2868-6. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-8071-2924-0.)

Although he wrote hundreds of opinions in the nearly thirty years (1862–1890) he served on the United States Supreme Court, Samuel Freeman Miller is most famous as the author of the Court's opinion in the Slaughter-house Cases (1873). Writing for a narrow majority, Miller upheld a Louisiana law regulating slaughtering houses and denied that the recently enacted Fourteenth Amendment provided any protection for the white butchers who had challenged it. Miller rested his ruling on what he asserted was the clear purpose of the Reconstruction era amendments, to protect
the freedom of the slave race, the security and firm establishment of that freedom, and the protection of the newly-made free-man and citizen from the oppressions of those who had formerly exercised unlimited dominion over him. (Slaughter-house Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 71 [1873])
. . .

There are about 327 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.