You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 170 words from this article are provided below; about 367 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.3 | The History Cooperative
91.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Natural States: The Environmental Imagination in Maine, Oregon, and the Nation. By Richard W. Judd and Christopher S. Beach. (Washington: Resources for the Future, 2003. xvi, 320 pp. Cloth, $32.95, ISBN 1-891853-59-7. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 1-891853-60-0.)

In the last decade Robert Gottlieb's Forcing the Spring (1993), Hal Rothman's The Greening of a Nation? (1998), and Paul Sutter's Driven Wild (2002) have traced the history of modern environmentalism. Each combines case studies with sweeping synthesis, but none completely answers the lingering question of why the movement fractured after Earth Day. Richard W. Judd and Christopher S. Beach offer a compelling answer in Natural States by tracing environmentalism's internal tensions in Maine and Oregon. The two states have long been linked to environmental values, but Natural States complicates such associations. Both were hotly contested battlegrounds, often divided by residence, political culture, and material interests. National trends devolved into idiosyncratic tales, and the law of unintended consequences convoluted expectations. Protection abetted gentrification, and planning unleashed degradation. Little was predictable. . . .

There are about 367 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.