You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 141 words from this article are provided below; about 405 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.2 | The History Cooperative
91.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Collaborators in Literary America, 1870–1920. By Susanna Ashton. (New York: Palgrave, 2003. x, 223 pp. $59.95, ISBN 1-4039-6217-0.)

Susanna Ashton raises a number of intriguing questions at the beginning of her innovative analysis of literary collaboration in Gilded Age America. Calling attention to the surprisingly large number of literary works that were written by more than one hand during this period, Ashton wants us to rethink what it means to be an author, particularly when that concept is, essentially, divorced from its conventional association with an individuated creative consciousness. Why was this period so conducive to collaboration? she asks. "By examining the ways in which collaborative fictions were assembled and conceived," Ashton argues, "we can see how the profession of authorship was variously defined and how those definitions were constructed in terms of one another" (p. 2). . . .

There are about 405 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.