You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 212 words from this article are provided below; about 423 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.2 | The History Cooperative
91.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Religious Pluralism in America: The Contentious History of a Founding Ideal. By William R. Hutchison. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003. xii, 276 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-300-09813-8.)

This elegantly written book constitutes William R. Hutchison's contribution to a conversation among specialists in U.S. religion. What general interpretive frameworks make the best sense of the variety of religious practices treated by the field? Hutchison comments that some scholars are so intent to map diversity that they remind him of scholars who survey politics without attending to Democrats and Republicans. In contrast, his interpretation centers on the Protestant establishment and its response to Catholic and Jewish immigration from the mid-1800s to the mid-1900s. 1
      The key limitation of this approach is that Hutchison does not foreground race and gender, nor outsiders who thrive by defining themselves against the establishment (as in R. Laurence Moore's approach). In Hutchison's model, Protestant insiders begin from a baseline of dominance in the early 1800s and then move through a series of shocks to this system. He emphasizes Catholic immigration before 1850, arguing that its proportional impact was greater than that of subsequent changes. Then he continues with treatments of later immigration, the rise of industrial cities, and other challenges to the status quo. . . .

There are about 423 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.