You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 236 words from this article are provided below; about 725 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 91.1 | The History Cooperative
91.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Tell the Court I Love My Wife: Race, Marriage, and Law—An American History. By Peter Wallenstein. (New York: Palgrave, 2002. xii, 305 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-312-29474-3.)

Race Mixing: Black-White Marriage in Postwar America. By Renee C. Romano. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003. xvi, 368 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-674-01033-7.)

Taken together, Peter Wallenstein's Tell the Court I Love My Wife and Renee C. Romano's Race Mixing provide a comprehensive account of intermarriage from the 1600s through contemporary times. Wallenstein chronicles the regulation of race and marriage from colonial times until 1967, when the United States Supreme Court declared antimiscegenation laws unconstitutional in Loving v. Virginia. Romano focuses on black-white unions from the post–World War II era until the present. 1
      The love of law appears to be Wallenstein's primary passion in his meticulously researched and painstakingly detailed narrative about the legislation and lawsuits that shaped intermarriage. In this law-centered story, the lived experiences of individuals figure at most peripherally as facts to "tell the court" or perhaps legislators. Wallenstein traces the roots of regulation of interracial marriage to colonial America, and he shows how this system adapted to meet the challenges of policing racial boundaries in an increasingly complicated system of white and nonwhite, slave and free. Mixed-race offspring blurred these boundaries by laying claim to freedom, sometimes successfully and sometimes not, based on alleged white or Native American ancestry. . . .

There are about 725 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.