You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 211 words from this article are provided below; about 415 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.4 | The History Cooperative
90.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2004
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



Roots of Secession: Slavery and Politics in Antebellum Virginia. By William A. Link. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2003. xx, 387 pp. $45.00, ISBN 0-8078-2771-1.)

William A. Link's new book shows how slavery lies at the roots of Virginia's secession. At first glance, this might seem like nothing new. Among Civil War historians, the idea that the issue of slavery caused secession and war is so widely shared as to make it almost a truism. 1
      Yet too often the story of antebellum politics has been portrayed from the top down by historians interested in explaining elections, party ideology, and sectional conflict. Even when such accounts examine the issue of slavery, they usually focus solely on the experiences and actions of the white men who made up the polity. Meanwhile, the lived experience of slaves and their resistance to the Old South regime has generally remained the province of social historians. Accounts of slavery and slave resistance have transformed our understanding of African American daily life while making scarcely a dent on our collective understanding of the state-level politics of disunion. Link's book is a worthy attempt to draw connections between the social history of slavery and the political history of the antebellum South. . . .

There are about 415 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.