You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 122 words from this article are provided below; about 404 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Previews | The Journal of American History, 90.3 | The History Cooperative
90.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
 


Previews



Looking beyond the romantic image of the triumphant mounted Indian, Pekka Hämäläinen shows that the rise of equestrian Indian societies on the Great Plains brought Native Americans both success and disaster. Horses brought some tribes wealth and power, allowing them to defy and occasionally eclipse Euro-American imperial designs, but for most tribes horses were a disruptive element that brought social inequality, ecological instability, economic devastation, and unprecedented violence. Hämäläinen identifies several distinctive horse cultures and shows that only one tribe, the Lakotas, achieved long-term stability. Attention to the Lakotas' singular success, he argues, has distorted our understanding of Plains Indian history.

 
The United States has a weak government that stays clear of producing goods and services, right? Wrong, argues . . .

There are about 404 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.