You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 151 words from this article are provided below; about 356 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.3 | The History Cooperative
90.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2003
Previous
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review



By Order of the President: The Use and Abuse of Executive Direct Action. By Phillip J. Cooper. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2002. xiv, 301 pp. Cloth, $39.95, ISBN 0-7006-1179-7. Paper, $16.95, ISBN 0-7006-1180-0.)

It is fortunate when a scholar has the opportunity to illuminate a topic that is both timely and, for the most part, not widely appreciated. Such is the case with Professor Phillip J. Cooper's study of what he aptly calls the presidential "power tools" (p. 14), those devices that enable a president to take "direct action" absent specific legislative or judicial authorization. These include the executive order, the presidential memorandum, presidential proclamations, national security directives, and the presidential signing statement. Cooper argues that, while these devices have become an important element of national executive governance, "they have been used in increasingly problematic ways that present constitutional, institutional, procedural, and policy difficulties" (p. 4). . . .

There are about 356 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.