You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 154 words from this article are provided below; about 353 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Tribal Sovereignty and the Historical Imagination: Cheyenne-Arapaho Politics. By Loretta Fowler. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002. xxx, 356 pp. $49.95, ISBN 0-8032-2013-8.)
Loretta Fowler has contributed greatly to our understanding of how tribal governments have maintained their efficacy and legitimacy in the face of coercive federal assimilation programs and rabid hostility from non-Indian neighbors. In this important work, Fowler traces from the early reservation years to the modern self-determination era Cheyenne and Arapaho (Oklahoma) resistance strategies to a colonial discourse that disparaged Indian character and blamed the victim for impoverishment. In the late 1960s a new generation of Cheyenne-Arapaho began to echo that discourse by criticizing tribal leaders' pursuit of sovereignty just at a time when the federal government became more supportive of self-determination. Contemporary political instability, rooted in historical and personal experiences with that discourse, has led to a crisis of confidence for political leaders and voters alike. . . .

There are about 353 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.