You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 150 words from this article are provided below; about 425 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Un-American Womanhood: Antiradicalism, Antifeminism, and the First Red Scare. By Kim E. Nielsen. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2001. x, 219 pp. Cloth, $55.00,ISBN 0-8142-0882-7. Paper, $22.95, ISBN 0-8142-5080-7.)
This book joins a growing literature on the gendered aspects of twentieth-century American conservatism. A wave of scholarship published in the 1990s documented the important state-building work of progressive women and invited gender analysis of right-wing reactions against expansions of government regulatory and redistributive capacities. Kim E. Nielsen's slender monograph advances that analysis by exploring the ideological and tactical linkages among antifeminism, antistatism, and antiradicalism in the 1920s. Those linkages were not unique to the United States or to the 1920s, but they were intensified by the convergence of the post–World War I Red Scare and the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, which created the possibility—inspiring to some, alarming to others—of united political action by female voters. . . .

There are about 425 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.