You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 171 words from this article are provided below; about 272 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Broken Trusts: The Texas Attorney General versus the Oil Industry, 1889–1909. By Jonathan W. Singer. (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 2002. xiv, 344 pp. $49.95, ISBN 1-58544-160-0.)
In November 1894, a McClennan County, Texas, grand jury indicted Henry Clay Pierce (the president of Waters-Pierce Oil Company), many company employees, and a number of Standard Oil executives, including John D. Rockefeller, of conspiring to monopolize the oil trade in Texas. There followed, as Jonathan W. Singer relates, Texas's first litigation to enforce its 1889 antitrust law, action resulting in Waters-Pierce being found guilty and barred from doing business in Texas in 1900. The company promptly reorganized, got a new permit to do business in Texas, and continued operations until 1906, when it faced a fresh bout of litigation. In the course of this second siege in the courts, Henry Clay Pierce himself was tried for perjury. Though Clay was found not guilty, once again Waters-Pierce was ousted from doing business in Texas, an apparent triumph for antimonopo-lists. . . .

There are about 272 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.