You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 137 words from this article are provided below; about 396 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Politics and the American Press: The Rise of Objectivity, 1865–1920. By Richard L. Kaplan. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. viii, 224 pp. Cloth, $60.00, ISBN 0-521-62151-8. Paper, $20.00, ISBN 0-521-00602-3.)
In the middle of the nineteenth century, newspapers enthusiastically waged political warfare and espoused party positions, with editors and journalists leading the charge. By the 1920s, however, according to Richard L. Kaplan, the press, cherishing ideals of objectivity and non-partisanship, stood apart from partisan conflict. Based upon a careful examination of Detroit's major newspapers, his study attempts to explain how that transformation came about and what significance it held for American politics. Moreover, Kaplan challenges the claims of objectivity and nonpartisanship offered by the press's defenders, arguing that newspapers are enmeshed in politics, privileging certain voices, defining issues, and responding to critics. . . .

There are about 396 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.