You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 227 words from this article are provided below; about 362 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Grant's Secret Service: The Intelligence War from Belmont to Appomattox. By William B. Feis. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2002. xiv, 330 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8032-2005-7.)
"The art of war is simple enough," Ulysses S. Grant wrote. "Find out where your enemy is. Get at him as soon as you can. Strike him as hard as you can and as often as you can, and keep moving on" (p. 268). Seen today, this tenet seems easy enough, yet the Union and Confederate armies in 1861 lacked any intelligence system; thus, finding the enemy in order to attack him proved a great challenge. Many Civil War commanders, most notably George B. McClellan, were seized by inaction when faced with these uncertainties. 1
     Grant, in contrast, not only utilized intelligence but also took decisive action. But his record of incorporating intelligence into his campaign planning is mixed, as William B. Feis notes in Grant's Secret Service. Feis takes us from Grant's first service in Missouri as a regimental commander in the summer of 1861; there, Grant learned what he considered to be an important lesson after the enemy had retreated as his troops approached. "From that experience to the close of war," Grant commented, "I never forgot that [the enemy] had as much reason to fear my forces as I had his" (p. 14). . . .

There are about 362 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.