You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 166 words from this article are provided below; about 376 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Translating Property: The Maxwell Land Grant and the Conflict over Land in the American West, 1840–1900. By María E. Montoya. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. xvi, 299 pp. $50.00, ISBN 0-520-22744-1.)
There is a certain injustice to the fact that this fine book appeared before the Colorado Supreme Court (Case No. 00SC527) affirmed the existence among Hispano residents on the historic Sangre de Cristo Land Grant of "customary" rights to grazing, firewood, and timber on lands now known as the Taylor Ranch. María E. Montoya uses disputed property rights on the Sangre de Cristo Grant—in the litigation over which she served as an expert witness—to bookend her detailed treatment of the adjacent Maxwell Land Grant. The supreme court ruling might have allowed her to extend her insights on the ironies of American property law to show how—at the dawn of the twenty-first century—what had long been an instrument of domination and dispossession had become, if fleetingly, a tool for social justice. . . .

There are about 376 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.