| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 203 words from this article are provided below; about 425 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

The Devil & Doctor Dwight: Satire & Theology in the Early American Republic. By Colin Wells. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2002. xii, 254 pp. Cloth, $49.95, ISBN 0-8078-2715-0. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 0-8078-5383-6.)

In The Devil & Doctor Dwight, Colin Wells offers a bold case for Timothy Dwight's epic poem, "The Triumph of Infidelity" (1788), as "perhaps the preeminent example of American neoclassical or Augustan satire" (p. 3) and as "a unique example of the convergence of literature, religion, and politics at the moment the new American Republic was first being imagined" (p. 16). Wells convincingly argues that, contrary to the claims of many of Dwight's contemporaries and some modern historians, the poem was not an expression of a kind of counter-enlightenment; instead, Wells writes, it was an expression of "Christian empiricism" and a central element of "an ideological struggle over the meaning of intellectual enlightenment itself" (p. 111). Dwight's "literary warfare against infidelity" (p. 11), Wells explains, was directed not only against Charles Chauncy's Universalist "pudding" but against all manifestations of what he viewed as the era's dangerous misunderstanding of man's flawed nature, a misunderstanding that he believed fueled the French Revolution and Jeffersonianism itself.

. . .

There are about 425 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.