You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 276 words from this article are provided below; about 521 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Decolonial Voices: Chicana and Chicano Cultural Studies in the 21st Century. Ed. by Arturo J. Aldama and Naomi H. Quiñonez. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002. xiv, 413 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 0-253-34014-4. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-253-21492-0.)
This is a superb text of literary analysis that attempts to analyze the dangers and problems affecting the socioliterary "Chicano body" (chapter 1, "Dangerous Bodies"); to deconstruct the textual intellectual tempers and cultural climates that continue to (post) colonize the Chicano community (chapter 2, "Dismantling Colonial/Patriarchal Legacies"); and to find out in what direction Chicano/a cultural studies is headed (chapter 3, "Mapping Space and Reclaiming Place"). This text must be seen as a milestone in the development of the state of Chicano thought and social theory, social theory because the essayists are interested in understanding the American hegemony of cultural power through the analysis of aesthetic vehicles, as the editors, Arturo J. Aldama and Naomi H. Quiñonez, write, of "subaltern cultural productions: such as 'films, art, music, lit[erature], pop culture, and alternative historiographies'" (p. 2) in order to change social and cultural conditions. The main tension in all of the essays is between theory and praxis and between the generations of Chicano intellectuals. 1
     The text essayists, paradoxically, define the Chicano community as a monolith and, basically, examine only writers who focus on workers, migrants, immigrants, and women. All of the essays, unfortunately, disregard historical works and only use the theorist Gloria Anzaldua's postmodern/postcolonial historical interpretation—with her emphasis on the concept of borderland, "La Frontera," which analyzes the collectivity of Chicano consciousness through the process of post-colonial "liminality"—a state of ambiguity, phantasmagoria, and reconfiguration (pp. 122–24). . . .

There are about 521 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.