You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 212 words from this article are provided below; about 412 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.2 | The History Cooperative
90.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Anglo-American Strategic Relations and the Far East, 1933–1939: Imperial Crossroads. By Greg Kennedy. (London: Cass, 2002. xiv, 313 pp. $57.50, ISBN 0-7146-5188-5.)
Based on impressive documentary research, Greg Kennedy's detailed study of strategic policy making argues persuasively that "the basis of the 'special relationship' of the Grand Alliance had been formed in the Far East by the events between 1933 and 1939" (p. 267). Already established as an expert on British naval planning, Kennedy here clearly demonstrates how strategic policy emanated from slowly developed subcabinet-level relationships of trust among naval officers, diplomatic representatives, and other government officials on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, whose work then informed policy formulation at the top levels of government. While not ignoring the importance of common cultural values, he emphasizes that the trust rested firmly on unsentimental balance-of-power appraisals on both sides, centering ultimately on the perceived common interest: containing aggressive moves by the Japanese that might threaten the two powers' respective positions in East Asia, and most especially in China. Finally, beginning with the American recognition of the Soviet Union in 1933, he devotes much space to a fresh look at how the appraisal of Soviet capabilities and intentions fit into the balance-of-power considerations of both American and British planners. . . .

There are about 412 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.