You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 268 words from this article are provided below; about 406 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.1 | The History Cooperative
90.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of Contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Color-Line to Borderlands: The Matrix of American Ethnic Studies. Ed. by Johnnella E. Butler. (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001. xxvi, 310 pp. Cloth, $40.00, ISBN 0-295-98090-7. Paper, $22.50, ISBN 0-295-98091-5.)
Those of us who have taught in or administered interdisciplinary programs in ethnic studies, American studies, and women's/gender studies know too well how laborious and frustrating such endeavors are in universities still largely organized by departments and disciplines. Too many such programs, or even stand-alone departments, are barely tolerated and are certainly understaffed and under-funded. They are often intellectually marginalized, discounted, and disjointed; they are usually structurally isolated, weak, or wholly or at least partially dependent for faculty on "mainstream" departments. So I turned to this edited volume on the state, institutionalization, and practice of American ethnic studies with genuine interest, anxious to see whether my vexed and vexing experiences as a program director in American studies were shared by others and faintly hoping to find a magic recipe both for making such projects internally vibrant and coherent and for inducing enthusiasm externally among skeptical colleagues and indifferent-to-hostile administrators. I found that, with a few shining exceptions such as the ethnic studies programs at the universities of Colorado and Washington, yes, my problems were hardly unique, and no, there is no magic recipe for program success or even survival. Most of the authors of the chapters in the volume—which grew from a 1993 symposium and a subsequent series of conversations among directors, chairs, and key faculty from ethnic studies departments and programs in the United States—express the same sort of frustrations I experienced. . . .

There are about 406 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.