| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.1

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 246 words from this article are provided below; about 408 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 90.1 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

The Second Amendment in Law and History: Historians and Constitutional Scholars on the Right to Bear Arms. Ed. by Carl T. Bogus. (New York: New Press, 2002. x, 358 pp. $24.95, ISBN 1-56584-699-0.)

Few issues in American public life have become as contentious as guns. It is almost impossible to discuss guns or gun policy without addressing the equally vexing question of what the Second Amendment means. Does the amendment protect the right of individuals to own guns, or is it a historical artifact of eighteenth-century Americans' fears of standing armies and veneration of a well-regulated militia composed of the sturdy yeomanry? Until quite recently this issue was about as settled as any in American constitutional law. Federal courts uniformly embraced the collective rights view of the amendment and dismissed the individual rights argument. Over the last two decades many legal scholars have embraced the individual rights view of the amendment and persuaded one federal court and John Ashcroft's Justice Department to adopt their interpretation. According to this new view the Second Amendment protects an expansive individual right similar in nature to freedom of the press. Some supporters of this view proclaimed their view the new "standard model" of the Second Amendment and declared the collective rights view of the amendment dead. The publication of Carl T. Bogus's important edited collection, The Second Amendment in Law and History, demonstrates convincingly that the reports of the collective rights death have been greatly exaggerated.

. . .

There are about 408 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.