You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 203 words from this article are provided below; about 358 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.4 | The History Cooperative
89.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Divided We Stand: Watertown, Massachusetts, 1630-1680. By Roger Thompson. (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2001. xviii, 269 pp. $39.95, ISBN 1-55849-304-2.)

As Roger Thompson relates in Divided We Stand, the Charles River community of Watertown worked hard to earn its obscurity. The town produced no great colony leaders, kept steadfastly out of the antinomian troubles and the Half-Way Covenant conflicts, saw little economic development beyond farming, and was rarely even mentioned in colony records after 1650. Nevertheless, Thompson sees in Watertown an opportunity to revisit the by now familiar topic of the adaptation and persistence of English ways in New England, and to determine how settlers were able to create stable communities amid a marked penchant for quarreling and dissent. 1
     If there was much about Watertown that reflected English ways, 'cultural conservatism could not mask the fact that this was a new creation.' In particular, Thompson argues that the American experience of Watertowners brought about 'revolutionary change' in patterns of landholding, religion, politics, and the labor market. Thompson is not breaking new ground here; his interest is in seeing how one community, steeped in English tradition, could adopt such radical changes while maintaining a conviction of tradition and continuity. . . .


There are about 358 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.