You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 192 words from this article are provided below; about 336 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.4 | The History Cooperative
89.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Boundaries Between: The Southern Paiutes, 1775-1995. By Martha C. Knack. (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2001. xiv, 471 pp. $50.00, ISBN 0-8032-2750-7.)

Martha C. Knack has crafted a richly detailed account of contact between various white communities and the scattered groups of Paiutes in what became southwestern Utah, southern Nevada, and northwestern Arizona. The whites represented a cross section of life in the West: mountain men, Mexican traders, Mormons, miners, soldiers, and federal bureaucrats. (Contacts with other Native Americans were important but are not analyzed in great detail.) Knack asks how Paiute ethnic identity adjusted and persisted, given that Paiute culture was always subordinated in the contacts. Her narrative is chronological, with each of the major white subcultures treated as a distinct segment for clarity, although they influenced one another. 1
     Whites had a common basic objective: to lay hold of Paiute resources. Land mattered most, followed closely by water. Paiute labor was snared, as were Paiute bodies and souls occasionally. But mostly Paiutes had to be shoved out of sight onto poor tracts that could not be farmed or mined or grazed and, if they resisted, indiscriminately murdered. . . .


There are about 336 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.