You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 231 words from this article are provided below; about 448 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.4 | The History Cooperative
89.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2003
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Imagine Nation: The American Counterculture of the 1960s and '70s. Ed. by Peter Braunstein and Michael William Doyle. (New York: Routledge, 2002. x, 398 pp. Cloth, $85.00, ISBN 0-415-93039-1. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-415-93040-5.)

This volume seeks to correct the conservative critique of the counterculture, from Ronald Reagan to Newt Gingrich, that saw it leaving a legacy of individualism and consumerism. It is not a difficult task, since the counterculture rejected consumerism and sought to overcome individualism with a new kind of community. The editors declare in their introduction that the term 'counterculture' 'falsely reifies what should never properly be construed as a social movement.' They describe it instead as 'an inherently unstable collection of attitudes, tendencies, postures, gestures, 'lifestyles,' visions, hedonistic pleasures, moralisms, negations, and affirmations.' Nevertheless, they proceed to divide the counterculture in a traditional historical way into two periods, early and late. The early phase began in 1964 with the optimism represented by the Beatles and ended in 1968 with the election of Richard M. Nixon; that phase was hopeful that society was about to enter a revolutionary post-scarcity epoch that would erase the work-play dichotomy and the repressive culture associated with it. The late phase of the counterculture came in the early 1970s and was marked by a fragmentation into different cultural liberation movements seeking to fulfill radical values outside a society that seemed irredeemable. . . .


There are about 448 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.