You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 226 words from this article are provided below; about 362 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The Color of Race in America, 1900–1940. By Matthew Pratt Guterl. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001. xii, 234 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-674-00615-1.)

The early twentieth century was a particularly labile period for ideologies of race in the United States. The century began with Italians, Greeks, Jews, Slavs, and Irish streaming in from Europe, many hoping to win a place at the American table. White supremacists thundered against "race suicide" and praised the virtues of Anglo-Saxon and Nordic blood, while African Americans remained out of sight in the black belt. Within decades millions of immigrants had passed safely into whiteness and were drawing a stark color line in northern cities against black migrants from the South. By midcentury the racial landscape was mostly binary: black and white, determined by skin color. 1
     While the outlines of this narrative have already been sketched, Matthew Pratt Guterl's spirited study provides some intriguing texture. He focuses on New York City as an incubator of race consciousness. Racial difference was construed differently around the country, he allows, but Manhattan's ascendance as a center of global capital, media, and anticolonialist movements made it a particularly important site. The Great War, the Great Migration, the postwar Red Scare, and race riots served as historical engines driving the process by which a messy racial taxonomy became consolidated into the biracial dyad. . . .


There are about 362 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.