You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 245 words from this article are provided below; about 387 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Tocqueville between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. By Sheldon S. Wolin. (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. x, 650 pp. $35.00, ISBN 0-691-07436-4.)

In 1960 Sheldon S. Wolin published Politics and Vision, a sweeping, influential exploration of the entire corpus of Western political thought. In it, Alexis de Tocqueville received barely a passing mention. Four decades later Wolin has perhaps overcompensated for that earlier snub with the massive book under review, which is an effort to situate Tocqueville at the epicenter of modern political theory. 1
      Because of the book's size and scope, it is important to understand what it is not attempting to accomplish. It is not, first of all, a work directed primarily toward historians. "I have tried to present a Tocqueville who is not so firmly in the French intellectual and political context of his times as to be irrelevant to ours," the author accurately asserts. Nor is Wolin much concerned with debating other scholars. Indeed, he discusses major issues in Tocqueville studies extensively without reference to recent scholarly debates. Thus he writes about Tocqueville and theory without alluding to Bruce Frohnen, women without Linda Kerber, penitentiaries without Roger Boesche. And on certain key issues Wolin is silent entirely. In spite of the importance Wolin attaches to Tocqueville's journeys, for example, readers will find no discussion of England, Ireland, Algeria, or Sicily. Imperialism is likewise a void. Tocqueville's English wife, Mary Mottley, is completely absent. . . .


There are about 387 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.