You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 163 words from this article are provided below; about 383 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court. By R. Kent Newmyer. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001. xx, 511 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-8071-2701-9.)

Today, almost exactly two hundred years from his ascent to the chief justiceship, John Marshall's star, along with that of the president who appointed him to the Court, is clearly on the rise. Evidence abounds. R. Kent Newmyer's new biography joins such important recent works as Jean Edward Smith's biography (1996), Charels F. Hobson's and Herbert Alan Johnson's accounts of Marshall as chief justice (1996, 1997), and James F. Simon's new study of Marshall and Jefferson (2002). It is not just a matter of quantity either; there is a real air of appreciation of the man and his deeds in most of the new work and a great freedom from the deep ambivalence toward Marshall characteristic of the classic statements of earlier ages, such as those of Oliver Wendell Holmes and Felix Frankfurter. . . .


There are about 383 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.