You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 292 words from this article are provided below; about 472 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative
89.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Anglo-American Attitudes: From Revolution to Partnership. Ed. by Fred M. Leventhal and Roland Quinault. (Aldershot, Eng.: Ashgate, 2000. xii, 313 pp. $84.95, ISBN 0-7546-0030-0.)

A compilation of fifteen essays covering the period from the American Revolution to the 1990s, Anglo-American Attitudes seeks to divert the story of Anglo-American relations from a traditional, twentieth-century, diplomatic focus. Its contributing authors and editors, all senior scholars well known in British studies, consider topics ranging from the end of salutary neglect in the colonies to the political power of Irish Americans to the waxing and waning of trade and finance between Britain and the United States. Unfortunately, while the quality of some of the essays is excellent, in others the case for a comparative framework is lacking, the research is not firmly based in primary sources, or the focus is so specific that it holds little relevance for a wider audience. 1
     The best essays consider British self-presentation over the long term; this could have been the theme of a more tightly constructed volume. Eliga Gould finds the surrender of Gen. John Burgoyne at Saratoga in 1777 to have been the moment in which the British came to regard a portion of British North America as a separate nation. The Revolutionary War taught the British an important lesson: that parliamentary supremacy could not be enforced abroad, nor could onerous taxes be collected in the colonies as at home. Paul Langford describes the ensuing early American republic as a time of cultural instability, during which the British and Americans painted each other as having drastically different manners and morals. As he shows, most Americans were at least as genteel as the middle-class parvenus who traveled to the United States to snipe about its inhabitants. . . .


There are about 472 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.