| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 273 words from this article are provided below; about 423 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

American Democracy Promotion: Impulses, Strategies, and Impacts. Ed. by Michael Cox, G. John Ikenberry, and Takashi Inoguchi. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. xii, 353 pp. Cloth, $74.00, ISBN 0-19-829678-9. Paper, $24.99, ISBN 0-19-924097-3.)

In an era characterized by humanitarian intervention and the employment of "good governance" as a criterion for foreign assistance, an examination of the promotion of democracy by the most powerful actor in the international system is a timely and useful reminder of what may, and what may not, be achieved in altering the ways that a people governs itself. 1

Most of these diverse studies argue that what the United States has promoted is a version of liberalism rather than democracy as such, distinguishing the two much in the manner of Fareed Zakaria in his 1997 Foreign Affairs article. Zakaria would find this conclusion reassuring, but a number of the contributors do not, seeing in "low-intensity democracy" a more faithful protector of a favorable environment for American economic and strategic interests than of the well-being of peoples abroad. Yet the authors represented here are also at one in agreeing that the promotion of democracy is instrumental—something inevitably undertaken not for its own sake, but because it aids the national interests of the promoting country or because it contributes to peace and therefore stability, a congenial objective for a power interested in preserving the status quo. They therefore largely demonstrate the point made by Reinhold Niebuhr that the limit of what a wise statecraft can do is to find the meeting point between the "parochial and the general interest, between the national and the international common good." . . .

There are about 423 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.