You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 251 words from this article are provided below; about 373 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


An Unsettled Conquest: The British Campaign against the Peoples of Acadia. By Geoffrey Plank. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001. x, 239 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-8122-3571-1.)

This book is a magnificent synthesis that exposes the evolution of British policies with regard to the Acadians between 1690 and 1760 and the context related to empire struggles that eventually led to deportation. Applying himself to grasp the collective stakes, Geoffrey Plank occasionally illustrates them through the life of a leader or a village history. Up to 1710, the British conquests in Acadia were characterized by dreadful looting. Thereafter, the occupation was definitive, and the British strove to shape Acadia on the systematic mode of social management. It became a matter of ensuring political loyalty, of securing conversion from Catholicism to Protestantism, and of modifying the integration model between colonists and Indians to one of apartheid. Early in the process, deportation of Acadians to France was considered, along with an assimilation strategy for the Micmacs. However, deportation costs and the warlike resistance of the Micmacs led to an in situ assimilation program for the Acadians and a genocide policy for the Indians. If the policies with regard to the conquered had evolved, they had always postulated a fundamental difference between Acadians and Indians, while in reality these two peoples were tightly interrelated. During the following decades there came to light, through the inconceivable Métis figure, the basic difference between the ancien régime French colonial model and the more modern English model. . . .


There are about 373 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.