You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 173 words from this article are provided below; about 383 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


Waiting for Dead Men's Shoes: Origins and Development of the U.S. Navy's Officer Personnel System, 1793–1941. By Donald Chisholm. (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. xx, 883 pp. $125.00, ISBN 0-8047-3525-5.)

In Waiting for Dead Men's Shoes, Donald Chisholm explains "how the navy's officer personnel system got from its simple, relatively crude state in 1794" to its complex and fully elaborated "configuration in 1941" and "why it took the particular form it did." 1
     The book is organized chronologically and contains a considerable amount of traditional administrative history. Although Chisholm acknowledges the value of both the "old institutionalism" and the "new institutionalism" used by various political scientists, economists, sociologists, and historians to study the creation, development, and transformation of institutions, he employs what he defines as "the problem-solving approach" used by some social scientists. 2



The structure, rules, and procedures of formal organizations result from the decisions of individuals acting on a day-by-day basis in professional capacities to solve problems that impinge upon their ability to get on with their business.


. . .


There are about 383 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.