You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 155 words from this article are provided below; about 456 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


The Many Legalities of Early America. Ed. by Christopher L. Tomlins and Bruce H. Mann. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001. xii, 466 pp. Cloth, $59.95, ISBN 0-8078-2632-4. Paper, $22.50, ISBN 0-8078-4964-2.)

Legal historians were brought up short by Stanley Katz's 1984 essay "The Problem of a Colonial Legal History" (in Jack P. Greene and J. R. Pole's edited collection Colonial British America: Essays in the New History of the Early Modern Era, 1984), in which he decried the field's limited scope and teleological tilt toward the American nation. As Christopher L. Tomlins, a coeditor of this volume, puts it, Katz argued that "colonial legal history had never established critical interpretive presence for itself." These essays resulted from a 1996 conference hosted by the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture that was designed to assess changes in the field since Katz's 1984 summary and to point new directions. . . .


There are about 456 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.