You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 235 words from this article are provided below; about 349 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.2 | The History Cooperative
89.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 


Book Review


Red Feminism: American Communism and the Making of Women's Liberation. By Kate Weigand. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001. xvi, 220 pp. $38.00, ISBN 0-8018-6489-5.)

Kate Weigand's work is a generally successful attempt to restore the legacy of Communist party women to the history of the women's movement. For too long, Weigand argues, historians and activists of the women's movements of the late twentieth century have accepted Mary Inman's contention that the American Communist party had squelched women's voices and prohibited all but the most superficial discussion of women's issues. In contrast to this interpretation, Weigand contends that progressive women in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s "revolutionized" discussions of women's issues "by conceptualizing the dynamics of women's oppression and liberation within a framework that made race and class central." 1
     The strength of Weigand's work is its analysis of how progressive women integrated Communist party efforts to combat racism and classism in their discussions of the woman question. Influenced by African American activists such as Claudia Jones, progressive women critiqued white privilege inside and outside progressive movements. Central to Weigand's overall thesis is her argument that this critique was picked up by and frequently discussed in the Communist press. This discussion of the interlinking of race, class, and gender, Weigand suggests, anticipated and formed a framework for those that later took place in the women's movements of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. . . .


There are about 349 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.