| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 275 words from this article are provided below; about 661 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

America's Boy: A Century of Colonialism in the Philippines. By James Hamilton-Paterson. (New York: Holt, 1998. xxviii, 462 pp. $30.00, ISBN 0-8050-6118-5.)

The Philippine War, 1899–1902. By Brian McAllister Linn. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2000. xiv, 427 pp. $39.95, ISBN 0-7006-0990-3.)

Although these two studies both examine aspects of United States imperialism in the Philippines, they have little else in common. 1

America's Boy is based on the author's seventeen-year residence in the Philippines, "conversations" with Imelda Marcos and thirteen of her contemporaries, the letters of the British ambassador to the Philippines in the 1960s, and selected secondary sources. Discursive, frequently speculative, and fond of spectacle, James Hamilton-Paterson employs a fabricated provincial village based on existing communities as a vehicle for making "sweeping generalizations" about the rural provinces and their relationship to the Marcos regime. 2

Some readers may be uncomfortable with this historical methodology, but Hamilton-Paterson's feel for the Filipino perspective constitutes the book's principal strength. In addition, he provides a lively narrative for the general reader. Prompted by his sense that ordinary Filipinos missed the Marcoses, the author seeks to reexamine their rule against the backdrop of U.S. influence and within the context of Philippine social and political practices. He argues that Spanish, American, and Japanese imperialism produced a confused and dysfunctional Philippine society and polity. Personal and family relations counted for far more than issues of party ideology; all politics was conducted in cash; everything was negotiable; and pageant trumped substance. Much of Philippine politics was a family squabble among the elite, and American backing or acquiescence was essential for any aspiring post–World War II Filipino leader. . . .

There are about 661 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.