| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 205 words from this article are provided below; about 313 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War. By Charles B. Dew. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001. xii, 124 pp. $22.95, ISBN 0-8139-2036-1.)

Charles B. Dew intends this short, stimulating work as a contribution both to the specialized historiography of secession and to the continuing popular debate over Civil War causation. Dew begins with the question posed by the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service about what "important issue" the war was fought over (correct answer: either "slavery" or "states rights"). He then reflects briefly on the conflict's contemporary reverberation, especially among southerners, for whom, as he notes with nice understatement, "the past . . . is far from dead." The book's brevity—only eighty-one pages of narrative—will not satisfy all scholars; some may conclude that this gifted historian should have set his account of the secession commissioners within a fuller examination of Deep South disunionism or perhaps given us more insight into how the message they carried with them was variously received. But all readers will appreciate the perspicacity and eloquence with which Professor Dew has performed his allotted task. They may even feel relieved that such tasty revisionist fare can be digested with so little effort. . . .

There are about 313 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.