You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 137 words from this article are provided below; about 176 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 89.1 | The History Cooperative
89.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


"Haughty Conquerors": Amherst and the Great Indian Uprising of 1763. By William R. Nester. (Westport: Praeger, 2000. xiv, 296 pp. $69.50, ISBN 0-275-96770-0.)

The title of this brief book would suggest a new approach to one of the best known events in the history of the British colonial frontier: the 1763–1765 war between trans-Appalachian Indians and the British army. Instead, we are offered a very conventional narrative of the war itself, another military history of the frontier. Instead of examining the still-unexplored dimensions of Lord Jeffrey Amherst's animus toward Indians, William R. Nester provides yet another summary of campaigns and battles. And, in addressing the "Great Indian Uprising," he places his work squarely within an older, now largely discredited, tradition that views native peoples as merely reacting to, rather than acting on, colonial powers. . . .


There are about 176 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.