You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 405 words from this article are provided below; about 15854 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
Christopher Capozzola | The Only Badge Needed Is Your Patriotic Fervor: Vigilance, Coercion, and the Law in World War I America | The Journal of American History, 88.4 | The History Cooperative
88.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 

 


The Only Badge Needed Is Your Patriotic Fervor: Vigilance, Coercion, and the Law in World War I America

Christopher Capozzola



On July 26, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson condemned mob rule. Almost four months had passed since Robert Prager, a German American coal miner, had been lynched. Wilson was angered that the enemy German press had used the killing of Prager in its wartime propaganda, and he felt increasing pressure from civil libertarians at home. In a widely reprinted proclamation, Wilson insisted on the rule of law. He claimed that "no man who loves America, no man who really cares for her fame and honor and character, . . . can justify mob action while the courts of justice are open and the governments of the States and the Nation are ready and able to do their duty." The mob spirit, Wilson averred, was irreconcilable with American democracy.

1

I say plainly that every American who takes part in the action of a mob or gives it any sort of countenance is no true son of this great Democracy, but its betrayer, and does more to discredit her by that single disloyalty to her standards of law and of right than the words of her statesmen or the sacrifices of her heroic boys in the trenches can do to make suffering peoples believe her to be their savior.1

In the early twentieth century, there was far less consensus about the nation's "standards of law and of right" than Wilson suggested. During and after World War I, Americans debated the place of extralegal violence in American political life. Through words and actions, they negotiated the boundaries of legitimate political coercion. These ongoing debates shed light on the relationship between voluntarism and state authority in twentieth-century American political culture. 2
     Woodrow Wilson's proclamations notwithstanding, violence has been a persistent feature of American political life, especially in the tumult of World War I. Political violence claims a central place in many narratives of the American past. To read them is to learn that violence is as American as apple pie, a point that would not have been lost on the crowd that strung Robert Prager up on the branch of a lone huckleberry tree on the outskirts of Collinsville, Illinois, and then dropped his body three times, in the words of one participant, "one for the red, one for the white, and one for the blue."2 . . .


There are about 15854 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.