You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 240 words from this article are provided below; about 350 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.4 | The History Cooperative
88.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Before Jim Crow: The Politics of Race in Postemancipation Virginia. By Jane Dailey. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2000. xii, 278 pp. Cloth, $39.95, ISBN 0-8078-2587-5. Paper, $17.95, ISBN 0-8078-4901-4.)

The late-nineteenth-century South was never as politically solid as it later became after disfranchisement. Jane Dailey's fine book is a study of the most impressive and successful of the era's insurgent coalitions of Republicans and independents, the Readjusters of Virginia, who managed to win control of the state legislature in 1879 and then again in 1881, along with the governorship. 1
     There have been several accounts of the Readjusters, but Professor Dailey's purpose is more specific, namely, to assess the racial and political possibilities that their ascendancy engendered. Historians have tended recently to downplay the salience of what C. Vann Woodward once referred to as "forgotten alternatives" to the repressive system that followed. Though far from an orthodoxy, it is this recent trend that Dailey nevertheless wishes to challenge. 2
     When the Readjusters decided to leave the Democratic party over the latter's refusal to scale down Virginia's postwar debt, they were forced to ally with the Republican opposition and its primarily African American constituency. Rather than backing into this coalition, Dailey argues, the Readjusters pursued it vigorously and imaginatively, fully aware of the risk and difficulty involved. Her succinct and well-written study examines this skillful political maneuver and does so with great subtlety and insight. . . .


There are about 350 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.