You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 166 words from this article are provided below; about 329 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.4 | The History Cooperative
88.4  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
March, 2002
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Divided Hearts: Britain and the American Civil War. By R. J. M. Blackett. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2001. xvi, 273 pp. Cloth, $49.95, ISBN 0-8071-2595-4. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 0-8071-2645-4.)

Divided Hearts might more appropriately have been subtitled "British popular opinion and the American Civil War." In fact, so single-minded is the author's concern with popular attitudes that practically nothing else is mentioned. We are not told how the cabinet viewed matters or even how susceptible it was to extraparliamentary pressure. Did popular opinion, as opposed to strategic considerations, have any influence at all on policy? It can, of course, be argued that these are questions that have been discussed elsewhere. Nevertheless, the failure to deal with them here is a source of weakness, for without a clear understanding of the broader context it is hard to see what the significance of the popular debate was other than a largely spontaneous outpouring of often ill-informed beliefs about the war and its causes. . . .


There are about 329 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.