You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 281 words from this article are provided below; about 430 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative
88.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


Restoring the Balance: Women Physicians and the Profession of Medicine, 1850–1995. By Ellen S. More. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. xii, 340 pp. $49.95, ISBN 0-674-76661-X.)

Before there were breast cancer coalitions and women's health networks, there was the "problem" of women in medicine. The choices made by such pioneer professionals as Elizabeth Blackwell, Mary Putnam Jacobi, and Alice Hamilton have stood as examples defining the "right" way women could and should practice medicine and, as the central focus of historical work, have powerfully shaped our understanding of gender in American medicine. Ellen S. More's insightful history of the experiences of diverse, ordinary American women doctors, with a focus on Rochester, New York, makes clear that the public and private lives of the great women doctors were hardly typical. More's wide-ranging study will engage historians, their students, and, I believe, health policy makers. 1
     Since the 1850s American women physicians have struggled to balance career with family and civic responsibility, navigating professional discrimination and private doubts. Sarah Adamson Dolley, who in 1851 became the third female M.D. in the United States, married a physician (a choice of around 25–30 percent of nineteenth-century American women doctors and of some 50–70 percent of married women doctors today) and established a joint practice with him in Rochester. After his early death, she raised her son as a single woman professional, balancing motherhood, private practice, and social reform work. Unlike their contemporary Blackwell in New York City, Dolley and her sister Rochester doctors quite easily adopted the germ theory, participated in dissections, conducted animal experiments, and performed gynecological surgery; like Blackwell, they strongly resisted alternative women healers, especially "doctresses" who performed abortions. . . .


There are about 430 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.