You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 141 words from this article are provided below; about 331 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative
88.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


The Shattering of Texas Unionism: Politics in the Lone Star State during the Civil War Era. By Dale Baum. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1998. xx, 283 pp. $37.50, ISBN 0-8071-2245-9.)

Who were the southern Unionists? This political conundrum has intrigued historians of the Civil War era for decades, and their answers have been varied and contradictory. Dale Baum now weighs into the debate with an intriguing analysis of county voting patterns in Texas between 1857 and 1869. His Unionists include a broad range of antisecessionists, dissenters within the Confederacy, and postwar scalawags. Not surprisingly, he finds the identities and motivations of these people to be mixed. More surprisingly—and significantly—he concludes that unionism, as an expression of a shared political ideology and agenda, cannot adequately explain the political divisions in Texas over secession, the Confederacy, and Reconstruction. . . .


There are about 331 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.