| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 232 words from this article are provided below; about 407 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Bloody Promenade: Reflections on a Civil War Battle. By Stephen Cushman. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1999. xvi, 295 pp. $29.95, ISBN 0-8139-1874-X.)

On May 5–6, 1864, in the dark recesses of the Wilderness in north central Virginia, Ulysses S. Grant's Union soldiers grappled with Southerners under Robert E. Lee in a bitter struggle. The Federals sustained 18,000 casualties, the Confederates 8,000. Some of the wounded perished when the thick underbrush caught fire and they could not drag themselves to safety or be rescued before the flames reached them. 1

Stephen Cushman, a professor of English at the University of Virginia, wants to understand the battle of the Wilderness as fully as any individual can who is separated by time from the 1864 participants. To achieve this, he consults not only historical and literary sources but Civil War reenactors, works of art, and the battlefield itself. The result is a work not unlike Tony Horwitz's popular Confederates in the Attic (1998). 2

Yet Bloody Promenade is not Confederates in the Attic. The author applies a similar narrative style, but his work has an informed literary tone as well. Nor does his book purport to be typical of historical analyses of the battle. "If this book is a history of anything, it's the history of verbal and visual images of a single, particularly awful moment in the American Civil War." . . .

There are about 407 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.