You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 257 words from this article are provided below; about 327 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.3 | The History Cooperative
88.3  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
December, 2001
Previous
Table of Contents
Next
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review


An Empire Divided: The American Revolution and the British Caribbean. By Andrew Jackson O'Shaughnessy. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000. xviii, 357 pp. Cloth, $55.00, ISBN 0-8122-3558-4. Paper, $22.50, ISBN 0-8122-1732-2.)

This book provides a careful treatment of the meaning of the American Revolution for the British West Indies. The first six chapters try to answer what Andrew Jackson O'Shaughnessy recognizes is an old question: why the British Caribbean colonies did not join the rebels of 1776. Historians from Eric Williams to Jack Greene have had a crack at this. O'Shaughnessy offers a detailed, reasoned, structured answer. It begins with three chapters on long-term circumstances that bound the white planter elite to Britain, such as social and cultural ties, educational experience, and the all-important fact that whites normally planned to return to Britain. O'Shaughnessy recognizes the military dependence of the planters on Britain, chiefly for protection against slave insurrection. He also emphasizes their reliance on the protected British market for their sugar, as they could not compete on price with French planters in St.-Domingue. These chapters are very clear and persuasive, but they do not explore the root of planter vulnerability and allegiance to Britain, which lay in the disease climate and demographic regime of the West Indies. Whites died much faster than other whites were born, so only constant immigration of people formed in Britain allowed planter society to persist; the proportion of the white population born and raised in the West Indies remained small (in sharp contrast to the North American colonies). . . .


There are about 327 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.