You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 187 words from this article are provided below; about 346 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.2 | The History Cooperative
88.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




The White Image in the Black Mind: African-American Ideas about White People, 1830–1925. By Mia Bay. (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. viii, 288 pp. Cloth, $45.00, ISBN 0-19-510045-X. Paper, $19.95, ISBN 0-19-513279-3.)

This excellent volume offers something richer than its title implies, since Mia Bay does not attempt to generalize about some flat undifferentiated white image in a two-dimensional black mind. She presents subtle shadings on a variety of images in the minds of African Americans and, perhaps more significant, chronicles black attitudes about the heritages of African peoples. Bay surveys numerous nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century thinkers, many of whom addressed history from what some present-day theorists might identify as Afrocentric perspectives. Would that it were no longer necessary to correct the naïve misconceptions perpetuated in such works as Malcolm X on Afro-American History (1967) or Yosef ben-Jochannan's screed on TUTANKHAMUN'S African Roots Haley, Et Al, Overlooked!?, published in 1978. It remains, however, sadly necessary for scholars such as Bay to bury the old "house Negro/field Negro" paradigm, which proclaims that supposedly assimilated African Americans have failed to develop critical attitudes toward European civilization. . . .


There are about 346 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.