| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.2

You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 169 words from this article are provided below; about 354 words remain.

If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:: • login here if you have already registered for online access.; • Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.
If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:: • Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.
Instititutions can:: • Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.

| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.2 | The History Cooperative

Book Review

Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood. By Peter S. Onuf. (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2000. xiv, 250 pp. $27.95, ISBN 0-8139-1930-4.)

Peter S. Onuf, in this stimulating book, explores Thomas Jefferson's image of a new imperial nation, one not built on "force or fear" but drawing its authority from the "consent of the governed" and that would be sustained in "an affectionate union" dedicated to the principles set forth in the Declaration of Independence. In five closely reasoned and clearly explicated chapters, some of which have appeared elsewhere, Onuf explains this vision and how well Jefferson understood what the new nation would become. 1

Jefferson's conception of American nationhood, Onuf argues, has been the "touchstone" for future generations of Americans. His republican empire had no metropolis, and it rejected the aristocratic, monarchical, corrupt old regime. His was an "empire for liberty" that emphasized equal rights and required that a "virtuous and vigilant citizenry" be able to defend its liberties against internal and external threats. . . .

There are about 354 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.