You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 217 words from this article are provided below; about 341 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.2 | The History Cooperative
88.2  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
September, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




Into the American Woods: Negotiators on the Pennsylvania Frontier. By James H. Merrell. (New York: Norton, 1999. 463 pp. $14.95, ISBN 0-393-31976-8.)

James H. Merrell's masterly study of the "go-betweens" who managed relations between Native Americans and Pennsylvanians in the eighteenth century tells a depressing tale—and not just for the way in which it shows "how, after 1750, Penn's Woods became an abbatoir." For the story Merrell tells reveals not so much a downward trajectory from Holy Experiment to Paxton Boys as a diplomatic system that never really worked, of societies whose interests were so profoundly at odds that any real meeting of the minds was virtually impossible. Colonists such as Conrad Weiser and native leaders such as Shickellamy for their own self-interested reasons kept things patched together for a generation, but, in the end, "far from being part of the solution to stormy relations between native and newcomer," such go-betweens "turned out to be part of the problem." The problem was not, Merrell persuasively argues, because negotiators were inept or unable to understand the aims and world views of the people from another culture. Quite the opposite; by the 1750s the go-betweens had helped each side to understand the other all too well, and the resulting familiarity bred something far worse than contempt. . . .


There are about 341 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.