You have not been recognized as a subscriber to JAH online. About 223 words from this article are provided below; about 373 words remain.
 
If you are a individual member of the Organization of American Historians, you may:
• login here if you have already registered for online access.
• Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.
• Set up your online account for the first time.

If you are not a member of the Organization of American Historians, you can:
• Join the OAH and receive many member benefits including print and electronic issues of the Journal of American History.
• Purchase a research pass to gain two-hour access to the entire History Cooperative web site. You will have full access to current issues of the Journal of American History (86.1-present). Note: the Research Pass does not provide access to JSTOR's holdings of the Journal of American History.

Instititutions can:
•  Subscribe to this journal and receive print and electronic issues.
• Activate your existing subscription so that we recognize your IP number ranges.
| Book Review | The Journal of American History, 88.1 | The History Cooperative
88.1  
Journals link Search link Partners link Information link
June, 2001
 
The Journal of American History

Table of contents
List journal issues
Home
Get a printer-friendly version of this page
 
 


Book Review




Cultivating California: Growers, Specialty Crops, and Labor, 1875–1920. By David Vaught. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999. xii, 280 pp. $38.00, ISBN 0-8018-6221-3.)

Cultivating California offers a fresh look at a topic that itself seems thoroughly well cultivated: California agriculture. "The diversity of California's agriculture is well known," writes David Vaught, "but the corresponding diversity and complexity of the labor systems that have sustained it remain something of a mystery." That is because books written about the evolution of agriculture in the Golden State so often tend to remain faithful to the basic storyline originally and compellingly articulated by Carey McWilliams in his Factories in the Field (1939), a popular study that is fundamentally a muckraking attack on growers. As such, Factories in the Field reflects the labor tensions of the 1930s. 1
     Vaught boldly challenges the McWilliams thesis and thereby provides readers with a much more nuanced and complex perspective on the subject of agricultural labor relations. His purpose, Vaught writes, is "to reassess the roots of the state's farm labor relations, and it is my contention that those roots are more likely to be found in grower, rather than worker, culture." Vaught is not necessarily pro-grower, however; nor is he antilabor. He believes that growers and workers deserve to be treated as something other than two monolithic categories. . . .


There are about 373 more words in this article. Please log in (or, if you are not yet an authorized user, please go to the User Setup page) to gain full access rights. Or if you're already logged in register your subscription.